Friday, December 27, 2019

Hits & Misses: Total Recall (2012)




Real Talk: I was a little lenient when I first watched this movie but that may have changed since 2012.

Miss: The original has this fitting title sequence accompanied by the epic music composed by Jerry Goldsmith. In the remake the movie title just appears on screen with generic sci-fi music playing in the background.

Miss: *Text Narration* The original Total Recall never needed any form of narration, everything was neatly conveyed through dialogues and character actions. I know this is for the sake of worldbuilding but if the remake can't even try to convey information the same way the original did it just comes off as lazy storytelling.

Miss: People behind this movie had the opportunity to make an accurate adaptation of the short story but instead they made a generic copy-and-paste version of the original with topics like Mars and mutants replaced with living spaces and colony. In other words in spite of this movie taking a different approach, most of the scenes will come off having zero narrative impact and predictable as fuck to anyone who has ever watched the original.

Miss: Lori in the remake is just the same as the Lori from the original except here she's a cross between herself and Rictor from the original.

Miss: Resistance Leader Matthias, a/k/a Discount Kuato

Real Talk: Nothing against Bryan Cranston but when it comes to the Cohaagen character he's no Ronny Cox.

Miss: The locations in the original had a unique aesthetic and look in every scene. While this movie has locations that'll give you Blade Runner flashbacks due to how samey looking they are. This movie might as well be a remake of Blade Runner, it be slightly less confusing. 

Miss: The majority of the movie takes place in the United Federation of Britain and The Colony (Australia) yet (aside from Lori) most of the main characters don't have a british or Australian accent. This won't feel weird or jarring at all.

Miss: Quaid from the original was so fixated on Mars that he wanted to move there with Lori. Then when he sees the Rekall commercial he decides to go there to pay for the memories of going to Mars. This version of Quaid has nothing of importance he was fixating on that got him to go to Rekall in the first place. So instead some rando character (Marek) who serves as nothing more but a plot device to convince Quaid into going to Rekall.     

Miss: And since I brought it up, this movie mentions Mars once...that's it.

Hit: SEXBOTS!!!

Hit: A woman with three breasts, a reference from the original Total Recall.

Miss: However, since Mars and to that extent mutants are not in this movie how does this one woman have three breasts? Is it a birth defect? Is the third breast a fake prosthetic? Is it a new form of body mod that women do in this movie? If the worldbuilding wasn't so lazy I shouldn't be asking these questions. The original conveyed that most people on Mars are mutants due to living under cheap domes that don't have enough air to keep out the rays. Hence the three breasted woman in the original.

Miss: The Bob character from the original was essentially a charismatic salesman in convincing Quaid into the Ego Trip offer along with the Mars Package. The Mac character in this movie just undersales it in comparison. And it doesn't help that he out right spoils the movie by saying "You could be working for the Resistance, maybe you work for Cohaagen. Or why limited yourself, why not both?" Not that this movie has anything to spoil if you watched the original.

Miss: Mac can scan Quaid's mind to see if he's hiding anything. But instead of waiting for the scan to finish he just injects the Secret Agent memory into Quaid anyway.

Hit: *Quaid kills the Federal Police as the camera does this long circle panning shot.* Interesting camera shot, a lot better than that shaky cam bullshit. Or those stupid seizure inducing jump cuts in one scene shot. 

Miss: These Federal Police guys set up cameras inside the locked room yet they don't noticed Quaid priming the grenades from the dead cops. Impressive technology these guys have. 

Miss: If only the original Total Recall didn't exist I would've found it surprising of Lori trying to kill Quaid.

Miss: And of course this movie copies Quaid's revelation that he's not who he think he is line for line. Trying something different, what's that? 

Real Talk: Having a phone inside your hand seems cool but that immediately gets ruined when you have to take it the hard way.

Miss: *Quaid finds a case with money, IDs, a disguise and a video message from himself.* Oh yes, this isn't lazily ripping off from the original. Nope not at all.

Miss: Remake rips off the scene where Quaid is in disguise until eventually his disguise glitches out. Only difference here is they put in this overweight woman as a wink wink reference of the original. Whereas Quaid was disguise as an old Asian man until his hologram mask just randomly glitches out upon arriving to UFB just to throw in another action scene. 

Miss: Somehow the flying car chase scene is giving Minority Report flashbacks.

Miss: Scenes in the original had build up and suspense due to the well thought out writing; leaving the story/plot to flow more naturally. The remake on the other hand bum-rushes through plot threads just to hurry up and get to the action scenes. I should be impressed by the action scenes but they just come off as distractions from how hollow the story/plot is in comparison to the original.

Miss: Instead of telling Quaid that the key is to a piano that displays an interactive message, Hauser from the video message was hoping for Quaid would be playing the piano out of curiosity. 

Miss: So Cohaagen's evil plan was faking terrorist attacks to mass produce more Federal Police Synthetics, more than enough to take over the Colony for the living space. I guess colonizing the Moon or freaking Mars was out of the question. Just take over this one free space that'll get overpopulated within a few decades.    

Miss: And here's this movie's biggest fuck you to the original Total Recall, the scene where Quaid is being talk down that he's still at Rekall living out his secret agent fantasy. When the original did it there was a feeling that got you thinking that just may be everything Quaid had experienced might actually be a fantasy the whole time. As for the remake you don't get that feeling because the original already done it but better and far more subtle. 

Real Talk: This is a problem with most remakes these lazy studios and filmmakers make such mediocre remakes, banking on them to be better than the originals. Don't get me wrong there good remakes (John Carpenter's The Thing, 1986's The Fly, Scarface), my problem is that good remakes are super rare. While most remakes these days are either lazy cash grabs or safety nets for studios/filmmakers to never take risks creatively and financially.

Miss: As much as I should care that Matthias is killed, I barely even knew this character to give any ounce of fucks about him. (Aside from being Melina's father if you're watching the extended director's cut.) At least the original conveyed some hints of who Kuato is before he's revealed and had a far more role than just being some resistance leader guy. 

Miss: Oh no Hauser was in on Cohaagen's plan the whole time.... Except I really don't care because I've seen the original so instead this is just a weak plot reveal.

Miss: So the Fall has to do a gravity shift every time it passes the Earth's core. Yet you mean to tell me that none of the federal cops (who have Quaid and Melina at gunpoint) didn't hear the gravity shift announcement? Nor don't have any measures to prevent themselves from free floating when the gravity shift happens? Plot convenience by inapt writing folks! 

Hit: *Quaid vs Cohaagen* Gonna be honest Bryan Cranston's a bad ass in this fight scene.

Real Talk: *Cohaagen dies when the Fall explodes.* I prefer the way Cohaagen died in the original, that was awesome.

Miss: So the Colony has independence now that the Fall is destroyed, ok good for them. But aircrafts do exist in this movie, so what's to stop the UFB from invading via airstrikes? 

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Hits & Misses: The Thing (2011)




Miss: Movie uses a variation of 82's theme music but doesn't have the same oomph as the 82's theme music.

Miss: And since I'm on the subject, compare to the 82's soundtrack the 2011's soundtrack is rather weak. It barely builds up any tension or atmosphere similar to the 82's Thing.

Miss: The opening title of 82's Thing was done with practical effects. (The title was placed behind a fish tank which was filled with smoke. While the fish tank was covered with a trash bag which was set on fire.) Whereas the opening title here was done digitally but just not as ominous as the 82's title opening.

Miss: *Halvorson recruits Kate for an investigation at the Norwegian Research station.* So let me get this straight, the research station doesn't have their own paleontologists or just fly one in from Norway. They had to recruit an American paleontologist instead. The 82's Thing never mentioned any Americans working with the Norwegians at the dig site.

Real Talk: Hey is that Tormund Giantsbane from Game of Thrones?

Miss: One of the problems with most prequels is the lack of continuity/consistency with the first movie. For instance, in 82's Thing MacReady and the others discovered from research videos of the Norwegians using thermite charges to dig up the alien spacecraft. Whereas 2011's Thing they just dug up the creature and left the spacecraft buried in the ice. Oh don't worry the movie fixes this problem, unfortunately it's gonna be inconsistent and stupid.

Miss: Halvorson: "Kate... In the future, don't contradict me in front of those people again." Kate: "I just thought..." Halvorson: "You're not here to think. You're here to get that thing safe out of the ice." Well the way I see it, given that the Norwegians had everything ready to go before Kate showed up she barely did her job. Hell she was quite surprised how fast they set up everything to dig the creature out from the ice that she said "you've gotten everything taken care of, I don't think you really need me". Point being they brought in a character whom's expertise was left underutilized and is just here as a fifth wheel. Ellen Ripley didn't had this problem in the first two Alien movies.

Miss: Also what was even the point of Halvorson recruiting Kate on to this discovery if he's gonna act like a dick-waving asshole to anyone questioning his authority?

Hit: *One of the Norwegian crewman is grabbed on absorbed by the Thing as another crewman calls for help.* Credit for the creature effects and for keeping the creature hidden in shadows just like in the 82's Thing.

Hit: Also credit for the practical/visual effects of the creature during the autopsy scene.

Miss: *Kate and Adam discovered that the creature was trying to imitate the Norwegian crewman.* If the 82's Thing didn't exist this would actually be a shocking revelation. Unfortunately that movie does exist and this scene comes off as a no shit moment for people who saw the 82 film.

Miss: In the 82 film, the sets of the American research station were done in Alaska and the Universal Studios Lot. Putting all their effort in capturing the atmosphere of antarctica. But in this movie, it's almost obvious they green screened some of the backgrounds.   

Miss: *Carter, Jameson, Griggs and one other Norwegian crewman were about to leave via until Kate flags them down. Thing-Griggs randomly reveals itself and attacks the Norwegian crewman.* From the way the movie played off that the Norwegian crewman could be the Thing, Thing-Griggs had no reason to immediately reveal itself. Especially when Kate thinks that the Norwegian crewman might be the Thing. Thing-Griggs could've just easily lied that the Norwegian crewman is the Thing.   

Hit: I'm gonna be a little lenient on the CGI when I say that the Thing-Griggs transformation was impressive.

Miss: *Thing-Juliette convinces Kate that Colins might be the Thing only to trick her into a room to absorb her.* The creature in the 82 film was established as not only intelligent but cunning. Getting into the blood supply storage with Gary's keys, building a makeshift spacecraft from miscellaneous parts and it tries to frame MacReady by taking some of his clothes and stuck them up a furnace. At no point the creature doesn't just randomly reveals itself for cheap scares. But rather whenever it's caught or (in the case of Thing-Norris being defibrillated) when it thinks it's being attacked.Yes it does try to absorb the American crewmen when it's alone but not when there's a chance it might get caught or the victim might get away. Point being with 2011's Thing it's like the filmmakers have no idea how subtitle scares work or fail to understand why the scares and the unsettling atmosphere worked so well in 82's Thing.   

Hit: Now again I'm being lenient on the CGI, Thing-Juliette's transformation was impressive.

Miss: Although some of CGI can get a bit jankey at times with some of these creatures are just floaty human heads with bodies made of teeth and tendrils.

Miss: Some of scenes and dialogues in this film are copied and pasted from 82's Thing. Fucking lazy, this movie is.

Miss: *Carter and Jameson made it back to the research station.* Peder: "It is impossible for a human to survive in that crash." I agree with that, not to mention they managed to walk miles back to the research station in a snowstorm. And what about Thing-Griggs, is it still alive? If not then how did Carter and Jameson managed to kill it?

Miss: They didn't burn the creature from ice with the rest of the things?

Miss: *Kate comes up a way to tell if any of the crewmen are the Thing by checking for metal fillings in their mouths. Due to the creatures inability to imitate inorganic materials.* Good idea but here's the problem. What if these guys didn't get any metal fillings, 50/50 they might not be the Thing. Or what if they're not missing any back teeth, what then? I'm missing some back teeth yet I don't have any fillings. Does that mean I'm the Thing? Like what Halvorson said, there are too many variables. Any of these guys could just lie that they never got metal fillings if they were the Thing. I know the filmmakers didn't want to copy the hot needle blood test scene. But they could at least thought up something that just as logical as that scene.

Miss: *Thing-Edvard just breaks apart then starts attacking everyone in the rec room with a large tendril.* There was no need for Thing-Edvard to randomly reveal itself and attack everyone. It wasn't being attacked (aside from that explosion after Peder got shot). It didn't get caught for anything odd or suspicious. So once again these disguised creatures randomly going into full monster mode for the sake of cheap scares.

Miss: *Adam tries to get out of rec room only to get stabbed by Thing-Edvard's tendril.* There was a window right next to him and his best idea was to run towards the danger to get away. Brilliant. I know it's cold as shit outside but he could easily broke into another window at some other area of the station.

Miss: You're telling me that the spacecraft is still functional the whole time it was buried? And instead of the creature to just take off back into space it decides to leave the spacecraft and ends up freezing in the ice.  

Miss: So basically when the spacecraft's engines start up the ship just magically unearthed itself from the ice. Instead of being dug up by Norwegians with thermite charges, fucking bullshit.

Real Talk: This part was hard to determine to be a miss. On one hand Carter could've been the Thing but on the other it's possible his earring could've fallen off back at the ship. And then there's Carter pleading with Kate not to burn him; not once did he transform and attack her. So chances are she just killed a human. 

Hit: And now this movie uses the 82's theme.

Miss: Kinda pointless to have Lars surviving this ordeal since he gets shot in the face by Gary in the 82's film.